The Alabama hair relaxer lawyers at Fob James Law Firm represent women in Birmingham and across the country who were diagnosed with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, or endometrial cancer after years of using chemical hair relaxer products. These cases are consolidated in federal court as MDL 3060, In re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, and new claims are still being accepted.
If you used relaxers such as Dark & Lovely, Just for Me, Motions, ORS Olive Oil, or Optimum and later received a cancer diagnosis, you may be entitled to significant compensation. Our biggest concern is making sure you get the justice and the compensation that you deserve.
Contact our experienced hair relaxer cancer attorneys in Birmingham, Alabama at 205-407-6009 for a free case evaluation. You pay nothing unless we win.
Alabama Hair Relaxer Lawsuit: At a Glance (July 2026)
- Who qualifies: Women diagnosed with uterine, ovarian, or endometrial cancer after regular use of chemical hair relaxers. Uterine fibroids with hysterectomy may qualify through state court programs.
- Litigation status: 11,877 cases pending in MDL 3060 as of the July 1, 2026 JPML report. Daubert briefing on causation experts is underway, and the first bellwether trials are expected in 2027.
- Settlements: No settlements or verdicts yet. Our attorneys project strong uterine cancer cases in the $150,000 to $1,000,000+ range (attorney estimate, not a guarantee).
- Alabama deadline: Generally two years from the date you discovered your injury (Ala. Code § 6-2-38). Wrongful death claims: two years from the date of death (§ 6-5-410).
- Cost: No upfront fees. We charge a 33-40% contingency fee, and you owe us nothing unless we recover for you.
- Talk to a lawyer: Call 205-407-6009 for a free, confidential case review.
Who Qualifies for the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit in Alabama?
Any woman in Alabama who used chemical hair relaxer or straightener products for an extended period and was later diagnosed with uterine, ovarian, or endometrial cancer may qualify for compensation. Women who were diagnosed with uterine fibroids and underwent a hysterectomy after long-term relaxer use may also qualify, primarily through state court programs.
You may have a hair relaxer claim if:
- You regularly used a chemical hair relaxer or straightener (many claims involve use several times per year over multiple years); and
- You were diagnosed with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, or endometrial cancer; or
- You developed uterine fibroids that required a hysterectomy after long-term relaxer use.
Not sure whether you qualify? Contact us and we will review your case for free.
Salon professionals are an emerging group of plaintiffs in this litigation. Cosmetologists and stylists who spent years applying relaxers in salon settings, often without gloves or adequate ventilation, experienced some of the heaviest chemical exposure. If you worked in a salon and later developed a qualifying cancer, our attorneys want to hear from you.
An estimated 90 percent of Black women in the United States have used a chemical hair relaxer at some point, and many started as young girls. Manufacturers marketed these products heavily to Black women for decades without warning about cancer risks. That failure to warn is the heart of the lawsuit.
What Is a Chemical Hair Relaxer?
A chemical hair relaxer is a product that permanently straightens curly or textured hair by breaking down the protein bonds in each strand. The product is applied to the hair, left in place for several minutes, and then rinsed and neutralized.
To do this, relaxers rely on harsh chemicals, including sodium hydroxide, ammonium thioglycolate, guanidine carbonate, lithium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, potassium thioglycolate, and Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (“DEHP”). Many of these ingredients are endocrine-disrupting chemicals, meaning they interfere with the body’s hormone systems. Scalp burns and lesions caused by relaxers make it easier for these chemicals to be absorbed into the body.
In short, long-term use of hair relaxers exposes consumers to chemicals that are linked to cancer and other serious injuries. If you have been injured by long-term hair relaxer use, call us at 205-407-6009 to schedule your free consultation.
What Cancers Are Linked to Hair Relaxer Products?
The hair relaxer lawsuit currently focuses on three hormone-driven cancers, plus one related injury:
- Uterine cancer
- Endometrial cancer
- Ovarian cancer
- Uterine fibroids requiring hysterectomy
The MDL court has limited the bellwether trial pool to uterine, ovarian, and endometrial cancer cases. Fibroid and hysterectomy claims are being pursued primarily in state court programs, including the Philadelphia mass tort docket. The science connecting relaxers to other injuries is still developing, so this list may expand.
Which Hair Relaxer Products Are Linked to Cancer?
The lawsuits name most major relaxer brands sold in the United States over the past several decades. Products commonly identified in MDL 3060 include:
- Dark & Lovely, Optimum (Optimum Care), and Ultra Sheen by SoftSheen-Carson, a division of L’Oréal USA
- Just for Me and TCB Naturals by Strength of Nature / Godrej Consumer Products
- Motions, Soft & Beautiful, and African Pride by Strength of Nature Global, LLC
- ORS Olive Oil Hair Relaxer by Namaste Laboratories, LLC
- Africa’s Best by House of Cheatham
- Crème of Nature and other Revlon relaxers (recovery on Revlon products is limited by the company’s bankruptcy)
These are name-brand products, and the same formulas were often sold under different labels. If you are unsure whether your product qualifies, contact our firm and we will investigate free of charge.
Does Hair Relaxer Cause Cancer? What the Science Shows
Multiple large, peer-reviewed studies have linked chemical hair relaxers to uterine and ovarian cancer. The evidence connecting relaxers to cancer is still developing, and we expect it to continue to grow as the litigation moves forward.
One chemical of particular concern is DEHP, a phthalate found in many relaxer products. DEHP is considered a probable human carcinogen and is associated with significant adverse health effects. Formaldehyde, another known carcinogen, can also be released when certain straightening products are heated during use.
Uterine Cancer
The landmark National Institutes of Health “Sister Study” found that women who frequently used hair straightening products (more than four times per year) were more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer. The NIH estimated that 1.64% of women who never used hair straighteners would develop uterine cancer by age 70, but for frequent users that risk rose to 4.05%.
Likewise, Boston University’s Black Women’s Health Study published findings in 2023 showing that postmenopausal women who used relaxers more than twice a year, or for more than five years, had a 50% or greater increase in uterine cancer risk.
Ovarian Cancer
The National Center for Biotechnology Information released Sister Study data reflecting that frequent use of straighteners and relaxers was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer by as much as 50%.
What Can I Recover From an Alabama Hair Relaxer Lawsuit?
A successful hair relaxer lawsuit can recover compensation for all past and future costs associated with your cancer diagnosis. Every case is unique, but recoverable damages generally include:
- Past and future medical bills, including medication, hospital stays, and in-home care
- Pain and suffering
- Lost wages and loss of earning capacity
- Loss of fertility and related life impacts, such as hysterectomy
- Funeral expenses in the event of a loved one’s death
If a loved one died from a relaxer-related cancer, Alabama law treats wrongful death differently than any other state: damages in an Alabama wrongful death case are punitive, designed to punish the wrongdoer rather than simply compensate the family. Our attorneys can explain how this affects the value of your claim.
To discuss the potential value of your case, schedule a free consultation with our hair relaxer attorneys.
Hair Relaxer Settlement Projections (2026)
Status of Settlements & Verdicts (as of July 2026)
- No hair relaxer cases have been publicly confirmed as settled or resolved by a jury verdict.
- The primary litigation is consolidated in MDL No. 3060 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois before Judge Mary Rowland.
- 11,877 claims were pending in the MDL as of the July 1, 2026 JPML report, with additional cases in Philadelphia, Illinois, Georgia, and New York state courts.
- General causation Daubert briefing is underway. The court’s ruling on which causation experts may testify is the next major inflection point in the litigation.
- The first bellwether (test) trials are expected in 2027, and Special Master Ellen Reisman continues to oversee settlement discussions.
- Because this is still a pre-verdict mass tort, all published figures are attorney estimates, not real payouts.
Current Projected Settlement Ranges
In cases involving uterine cancer with strong proof, we currently project settlement ranges from $150,000 to $1,000,000+ in many instances, and potentially higher in especially strong factual scenarios. Cases with less compelling proof, fewer damages, or weaker documentation may fall well below these ranges.
What Drives Variation in Case Value
- Strength of scientific causation and expert testimony. Whether the plaintiff can prove that specific relaxer products or chemicals contributed to her cancer heavily influences value.
- Severity and permanence of injury. Cases involving advanced cancer, fertility loss (such as hysterectomy), ongoing medical care, or death demand higher valuations.
- Duration, frequency, and product documentation. Better documentation of long-term usage and product brands enhances credibility and value.
- Economic and non-economic damages. Past and future medical costs and lost income, plus pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life, push case values upward.
- Defendants’ liability exposure and ability to pay. Well-capitalized manufacturers such as L’Oréal may support higher settlements than smaller entities. Recovery against Revlon is limited to insurance because of its bankruptcy.
- Timing and settlement leverage. Plaintiffs positioned after favorable Daubert rulings or bellwether verdicts may gain leverage to negotiate higher amounts.
- Administrative and litigation costs. Judge Rowland has set the MDL common benefit assessment at 11% (8% fees, 3% expenses), which is deducted in addition to individual attorney fees in MDL settlements.
How Long Do I Have to File a Hair Relaxer Lawsuit in Alabama?
In Alabama, you generally have two years from the date you discovered your hair relaxer related injury to file a lawsuit. Ala. Code § 6-2-38. If your loved one died as a result of hair relaxer products, you have two years from the date of your loved one’s death to file a wrongful death lawsuit under Ala. Code § 6-5-410.
Every state’s deadline is different, and the date your clock started running depends on the facts of your diagnosis. Do not assume you are too late (or that you have plenty of time) without talking to an attorney. A short, free phone call can protect your claim.
How Alabama Law Applies to Hair Relaxer Claims
Although hair relaxer cases are litigated in the federal MDL, Alabama substantive law can govern the claims of Alabama women. Three features of Alabama law matter most in these cases:
- The AEMLD. Alabama product liability claims proceed under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine, which allows recovery when a product was unreasonably dangerous as designed or sold. Hair relaxer plaintiffs typically pair AEMLD claims with negligence, wantonness, and failure to warn counts.
- Punitive-only wrongful death damages. Alabama is the only state where wrongful death damages are exclusively punitive under Ala. Code § 6-5-410, which can significantly affect valuation when a woman has passed away from a relaxer-related cancer.
- Where your case is filed. Alabama hair relaxer cases are filed directly into MDL 3060 in the Northern District of Illinois. If a case does not resolve in the MDL, it can be transferred back to federal court in Alabama for trial.
Our firm handles these Alabama-specific issues every day. Fob James Law Firm is headquartered in Birmingham and represents women throughout Alabama, including Montgomery, Huntsville, Mobile, Tuscaloosa, and Dothan, as well as clients nationwide.
How Do I Join the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit in Alabama?
It is simple to join the hair relaxer lawsuit. Here is how the process works:
- Free consultation. Call us or submit your contact information, and one of our attorneys will discuss your case with you.
- Case investigation. We confirm your product use and gather your medical records at no cost to you.
- Filing. We file your individual lawsuit directly into MDL 3060 in federal court and handle every deadline, including your Plaintiff Fact Sheet.
- You focus on your health. We handle the litigation and keep you updated at every stage.
We represent hair relaxer victims in all states. It does not matter where you live: all hair relaxer cases are filed in the MDL, which is federal court, and you will not need to travel to Illinois in the vast majority of cases.
What Are the Attorney Fees to Hire a Hair Relaxer Cancer Attorney?
Fob James Law Firm operates on a contingency fee basis. We only get paid a percentage of the recovery if we successfully resolve your case. Our fees come out of a favorable settlement or jury award, not out of your pocket. Importantly, if we do not obtain a recovery, you owe us nothing.
Many clients have told us that other firms are charging a 45% contingency fee in the hair relaxer lawsuit. Fob James Law Firm charges hair relaxer clients a 33-40% contingency fee, meaning our fee is 33-40% of the total amount recovered in your case.
To speak with one of our experienced hair relaxer lawyers in Birmingham, Alabama, call us today at 205-407-6009.
When Will the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Be Settled?
Realistically, we do not expect a global hair relaxer settlement before 2027, and 2028 is possible. Here is why: mass torts of this size almost never settle until the science has been tested in court. The MDL is now in its expert phase. General causation Daubert motions were filed in April 2026 and are being briefed, case-specific Daubert and summary judgment motions are due November 16, 2026, and briefing runs into January 2027.
The first bellwether trials are expected in 2027. These test trials give both sides a barometer on the value and strength of hair relaxer cases. If plaintiffs win favorable Daubert rulings and early verdicts, pressure on the defendants to negotiate a global settlement will increase substantially. Special Master Ellen Reisman has already been appointed to coordinate settlement discussions, which tells you the court is keeping that path open.
One important note: women who file now will be positioned ahead of any settlement framework. Waiting can cost you both your filing deadline and your place in line.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Updates
At Fob James Law Firm, we closely track the hair relaxer lawsuits against L’Oréal, Revlon, and other manufacturers. Below are the most recent updates from the multidistrict litigation (MDL 3060) and related state court cases. For in-depth coverage, visit our Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Blog.
📅 Last updated: July 10, 2026
July 10, 2026 – MDL Passes 11,877 Cases as the Daubert Fight Takes Center Stage
The July 1, 2026 JPML report shows 11,877 pending cases in the Hair Relaxer MDL, an increase of 154 cases over the past month. Filings remain steady even as the litigation moves deeper into its expert phase.
The central battle right now is Daubert. Both sides have filed motions challenging the other’s general causation experts, and Judge Rowland’s ruling on which experts may testify about the link between relaxer chemicals and uterine, ovarian, and endometrial cancer will shape everything that follows: bellwether trials, settlement leverage, and case values.
At the July 2 status conference, the Court also addressed a discovery dispute involving RNA Corporation, a second-wave defendant that several bellwether defendants have pointed to as a necessary party. Plaintiffs are seeking expedited discovery from RNA, and the Court ordered short briefs on the issue, with any remaining disputes likely headed to the Special Master. Plaintiffs are separately challenging L’Oréal’s attempt to rewrite portions of its corporate witness’s deposition testimony through the errata process.
Looking ahead: additional bellwether fact discovery closed June 10, case-specific Daubert and summary judgment motions are due November 16, 2026, and the first bellwether trials remain on track for 2027.
June 1, 2026 – The Battle of the Experts Is Underway as Bellwether Discovery Nears Its Close
The Hair Relaxer MDL is approaching 12,000 filed cases, and a mini mass tort in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas has gained momentum with 25 cases now pending. We are just one week away from the close of case-specific bellwether discovery, and the battle of the experts is officially underway.
The central question before the Court is whether Plaintiffs’ expert testimony on causation will survive Daubert scrutiny for all three cancer types: uterine, ovarian, and endometrial. The answer will shape the trajectory of the entire litigation moving forward.
We do not expect many significant developments over the summer months, but we predict the MDL will surpass 15,000 filed cases before the end of 2026. With the MDL created in February 2023, the first bellwether trial will likely be set roughly 4.5 years later. While not quite as fast as the Depo-Provera rocket docket, considering the number of defendants and the multiple injury categories at issue, this timeline is about what we expected for a litigation of this scale.
April 1, 2026 – Hair Relaxer MDL Enters Critical Phase: Daubert and Bellwether Selection Front and Center
Three years after MDL No. 3060 was formed, the litigation is heating up. The Court and parties are now focused on two of the most consequential aspects of any MDL: expert testimony and bellwether selection.
The all-important Daubert hearing, where Judge Rowland will decide which experts come in and which get excluded, is approaching. A favorable ruling for Plaintiffs on causation could build significant pressure on Defendants toward settlement.
With expert discovery largely complete, attention has shifted to bellwether selection. In a recent filing, Defendants identified 12 Plaintiffs they believe should serve as the bellwether cases. Notably, 11 of the 12 were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. The remaining Plaintiff had ovarian cancer, but Defendants flagged that she also used J&J Talcum Powder, a fact that could complicate causation arguments against the hair relaxer manufacturers.
The Court has not yet made its final selections, but Defendants’ filing makes their strategy clear: they believe endometrial cancer cases give them the best shot at a defense verdict. Which injuries the Court ultimately selects for bellwether workup will be a major development to watch.
November 1, 2025 – Depositions Scheduled in the MDL Bellwether Cases
The next phase in the Hair Relaxer MDL is underway as depositions are being scheduled in the 32 bellwether cases. We expect the majority of depositions will be completed over the next three months.
January 2026 is shaping up to be a critical month in the litigation. Judge Mary M. Rowland, who is overseeing the MDL, has scheduled a “Science Day” for that month. During this session, Plaintiff Leadership will have the opportunity to educate Judge Rowland, and attending state court judges, about the scientific evidence linking chemical hair relaxer products to cancer.
This stage marks an important milestone in the bellwether preparation process, as discovery continues to move forward and the parties refine their expert strategies ahead of trial.
October 16, 2025 – Georgia Supreme Court Allows Hair Relaxer Lawsuits to Proceed in State Court
On October 15, 2025, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that the state’s 10-year period to sue from the time you purchase a product applies to each purchase of a product, not automatically from the first time someone ever used it. That means a Georgia woman’s lawsuit against hair relaxer makers can move forward. The court did not decide whether the products caused the alleged health problems; it only held that her claim is timely and may be litigated.
October 6, 2025 – What to Expect Next in the Hair Relaxer Litigation
Bellwether Trial Preparation. Initial bellwether trials are being prepared. These test cases will play a pivotal role in shaping settlement strategies and providing insight into potential jury reactions.
Expert Discovery Deadlines. Critical deadlines were set for expert disclosures: Plaintiffs’ expert reports due by October 31, 2025; Defendants’ expert reports due by December 1, 2025; Plaintiffs’ rebuttal reports due by December 15, 2025.
Science Day Scheduled. A “Science Day” was planned for January 2026, where both parties present scientific evidence regarding the link between hair relaxer products and various cancers. This session aims to educate the judge on the medical and toxicological aspects central to the case.
Defendants’ Legal Challenges. Several defendants, including John Paul Mitchell Systems, Wella Operations US LLC, and Advanced Beauty, Inc., had sought to dismiss the lawsuits against them. Judge Mary M. Rowland denied these motions, ensuring that these companies remain part of the ongoing litigation.
Projected Settlement Outlook. While no settlements had been finalized as of October 2025, industry estimates suggest that individual payouts could range from $150,000 to $1,000,000+, depending on factors such as the severity of the injury and the strength of the evidence presented.
September 4, 2025 – Key Developments and Outlook
The Hair Relaxer Multidistrict Litigation (MDL No. 3060) now includes 10,858 pending cases, marking significant growth from prior months. Major companies such as L’Oréal and Revlon face allegations of failing to warn consumers about cancer risks. Studies, including the NIH Sister Study, show higher risks of uterine cancer among frequent users. The Court is preparing for bellwether trials that will set precedents for future cases.
August 1, 2025 – Number of Filed Cases in Hair Relaxer MDL Passes 10,000
The number of filed cases in the Hair Relaxer MDL crossed 10,000. Additional cases are pending in Philadelphia, Atlanta, and New York. Given the size of the MDL, resolution is not expected before expert discovery and Daubert motions. A global settlement may not occur until late 2026 or 2027.
July 3, 2025 – Hair Relaxer Science Day Scheduled for 2026
The MDL Court scheduled a Science Day for January 2026. Each side will present scientific evidence on whether hair relaxers cause uterine and ovarian cancer. First impressions at Science Day will be critical in persuading the Court on causation issues.
June 1, 2025 – New Hair Relaxer Mass Tort Established in Philadelphia
A mass tort has been established in Philadelphia state court, separate from the federal MDL. Unlike the MDL, these cases allow claims for uterine fibroids with hysterectomy.
May 7, 2025 – Special Settlement Master Appointed
Judge Rowland appointed Ellen Reisman as Special Master to oversee settlement discussions in the hair relaxer litigation. Reisman is an experienced mass tort mediator, making her selection a positive development.
2024-2025 Archive: Earlier Hair Relaxer Litigation Updates
April 3, 2025. Each side will select 20 cases (reduced to 32) by April 30, 2025, from cases filed on or before February 1, 2024. Only ovarian, uterine, or endometrial cancer cases will be considered for the bellwether pool.
March 7, 2025. Nearly 10,000 lawsuits are pending. Parties are in talks about appointing a mediator to facilitate potential global settlement.
February 25, 2025. The Court entered a scheduling order with deadlines extending into 2026, setting the stage for bellwether trials in 2027. Key deadlines include bellwether selections (April 30, 2025), close of case-specific discovery (February 16, 2026), Daubert motion deadline (April 1, 2026), and the end of motion practice briefing (January 6, 2027).
December 3, 2024. Recent state court filings suggest fibroid/hysterectomy cases may be viable despite being excluded from the MDL’s initial scope. These claims may not yield as much compensation as cancer cases.
November 1, 2024. Over 1,000 new cases were filed in October, bringing the total to more than 9,500. Growth may be driven by statute of limitations concerns and strong scientific support.
October 2, 2024. Cases have been filed in Illinois, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New York state courts. Plaintiffs believe state courts may offer faster timelines and more favorable jury pools.
September 2, 2024. Congresswomen Ayanna Pressley and Shontel Brown urged the FDA to act on banning formaldehyde in hair relaxers after repeated delays.
August 3, 2024. Roughly 8,200 cases have been filed in the MDL. The parties are involved in discovery disputes, including the scope of information the parties are required to provide to the other side.
July 1, 2024. A group of plaintiffs filed a motion asking the Court for a 60-day extension to submit substantially complete Plaintiff Fact Sheets. If you think your fact sheet might be deficient, please contact your attorney ASAP.
June 2, 2024. The defendants are flagging Plaintiff Fact Sheets they deem to be incomplete, triggering a process where Plaintiffs have the opportunity to supplement.
May 10, 2024. The FDA’s deadline to propose a ban on formaldehyde in hair products expired without action, despite formaldehyde’s link to cancer.
April 10, 2024. A woman from Dothan, AL filed a lawsuit in the hair relaxer litigation (MDL 3060) alleging that products made by L’Oréal and others caused her uterine cancer and hysterectomy. The plaintiff used hair relaxers from 1977 until 2021. If the case is not resolved through the MDL, the case may get transferred back to federal court in Alabama.
Read Our Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Blog For Detailed News And Updates ➞
Why Our Hair Relaxer Attorneys Are the Best Choice in Alabama
For more than 40 years, the attorneys at Fob James Law Firm have been fighting for victims of fraud and injuries in Alabama. Managing attorney Fob James, IV has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 and SuperLawyers, and our firm actively litigates mass tort cases in federal courts across the country.
- We work closely with each of our clients, ensuring they receive personalized attention. With our firm, you will actually speak with your dedicated lawyer, not an assistant.
- We do not take so many cases that we lose time to get to know our clients on a personal basis. Knowing what our clients are going through helps us advocate more effectively on their behalf.
- We move fast. We do not sit on cases. When we take your case, we aggressively work it from day one to ensure you get the compensation you deserve as soon as possible.
- We are not afraid to take your case to trial. As trial lawyers, we love to litigate cases in courthouses across the country.
- We never charge fees up front. If we do not win your case, you owe us nothing.
Our case results and client testimonials speak for themselves. Call us today to schedule your free consultation and case review.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit FAQs
How much is the hair relaxer lawsuit settlement per person?
No hair relaxer settlements have been paid yet. Based on comparable litigation, our attorneys project strong uterine cancer cases could resolve between $150,000 and $1,000,000 or more, with weaker cases falling below that range. These are attorney estimates, not guarantees, and no amount is certain until cases resolve.
Is it too late to file a hair relaxer lawsuit in Alabama?
In most cases, no. Alabama generally gives you two years from the date you discovered your hair relaxer injury to file, and new cases are still being accepted into MDL 3060. Because deadlines depend on your diagnosis date, contact an attorney promptly to protect your claim.
What proof do I need for a hair relaxer claim?
You need proof of regular hair relaxer use, such as receipts, photos, salon records, or a sworn statement identifying the brands you used, plus medical records confirming a diagnosis of uterine, ovarian, or endometrial cancer. Our firm gathers and organizes this evidence for you at no upfront cost.
Do I have to travel to Illinois for the hair relaxer MDL?
No. Hair relaxer cases are filed directly into MDL 3060 in the Northern District of Illinois, but virtually all client work, including paperwork, records collection, and depositions if needed, is handled from your home state. Our Birmingham office manages the entire process for Alabama clients.
Which cancers qualify for the hair relaxer lawsuit?
The MDL bellwether cases focus on uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. Women who developed uterine fibroids requiring hysterectomy after long-term relaxer use may also qualify, primarily through state court programs such as the Philadelphia mass tort docket.
How much does a hair relaxer lawyer cost?
Nothing upfront. Fob James Law Firm handles hair relaxer cases on a contingency fee of 33 to 40 percent of the recovery, below the 45 percent some firms charge. If we do not win your case, you owe us nothing.
Has anyone received money from the hair relaxer lawsuit yet?
No. As of July 2026, no hair relaxer case has publicly settled or reached a jury verdict. The litigation is in the expert phase, with Daubert rulings and 2027 bellwether trials expected to drive settlement negotiations.
When will the hair relaxer lawsuit be settled?
Most likely 2027 or 2028. First bellwether trials are expected in 2027, and mass torts of this size usually settle after early trial results give both sides a clearer picture of case values. Special Master Ellen Reisman is already coordinating settlement discussions.
Hair Relaxer Claims by State
We represent women harmed by chemical hair relaxers across the Southeast and beyond. Start with our guides for Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, or Washington, D.C. claims. Clients in the Memphis area can also see our Memphis hair relaxer lawyer page. The medical proof is the same everywhere; the deadlines are not.
Contact a Hair Relaxer Lawyer Near Me in Alabama
At Fob James Law Firm, our job is to help you to the best of our ability and fight for you. If you have suffered cancer as a result of using hair relaxer or straightener products, you should contact our hair relaxer attorneys immediately. We can determine whether you are eligible to file a lawsuit, and it will not cost you anything to speak with us. You will never pay us anything until we successfully settle or win your case.
Our Birmingham, Alabama hair relaxer lawyers serve clients throughout the state, including Birmingham, Montgomery, Huntsville, Mobile, Tuscaloosa, Hoover, and Dothan, and we accept hair relaxer cases nationwide. We treat every client exactly how we would want our own family members to be treated.
Contact us right now at 205-407-6009 or set up a free case evaluation so we can help you.
Related mass tort cases we handle: Depo-Provera Lawsuit | NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit | Roundup Lawsuit